Re: [LUNI] Ach! 701c/Debian problems

From: chamster (chamster@acorn.he.net)
Date: Wed Mar 14 2001 - 18:51:06 CST

  • Next message: bobby fuesz: "Re: [LUNI] Ach! 701c/Debian problems"

    On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Martin Maney wrote:
    > On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 03:50:30PM -0800, chamster wrote:
    > > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free

    > > (Various debates as to the virtues of ftp vs. http for this sort of
    > > thing.)
    >
    > for a while (I finally stopped trying), but even aside from that I seem to
    > get more consistent results both at home and from the lab, with the http:
    > flavors. Purely anecdotal data, that, as is the observation that I have
    > used ftp: sites with excellent results for a long time, too.

    Not that I'm an expert at this, but it does seem to be zippier with http
    at least from a dial-up perspective. Supposedly, http has less overhead
    since FTP was built for more interaction, but I've seen folks dispute
    this as well.

    Steve

    -=-
    Linux Users Of Northern Illinois: General Discussion Mailing list.
    For unsubscription, archives, and announcements only see http://luni.org



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 14 2001 - 18:52:40 CST

  •